Would You Buy Crackers From This Owl?

Kroger's new entry price-point brand

Kroger’s new entry price-point brand

Have you heard this one? Knock-knock. Who’s there? Moo. Moo wh…INTERRUPTING COW! Well meet Kroger’s new interrupting owl.

In June Kroger launched 3 new private label brands to replace their aging “Value” brand for entry price-point products. The move was more than a facelift; it was a complete re-imagining of the branding strategy for this tier of products. It marks a big shift in the role of the Kroger name in the mix of merchandise by excluding their logo altogether. Two of the new brands are certainly quirky- an owl whispering “P$$T” for food items, and “Check this out” for non-foods. There is also a fresh food solution that used to scream “Value” in red and blue but is now tastefully presented as Heritage Farms. It is the talking owl, however, that is worth examining.

This “talking owl” approach reflects a new consumer proposition around savings grown out of the Great Recession; saving is fashionable, saving is fun, savings are gathered not hunted. (It also shows some bravery on the part of Kroger to embrace an unorthodox new creative direction.)

The past solution utilized the store’s logo as an endorsement and the big Value message was code for “cheap”. I can see the up side of removing the store name from these entry price-point products for Kroger. It’s a potential drag on quality associations when the chain is looking to associate its logo with national brand competing products elsewhere on the shelf. It is also tough for Kroger generally since they go to market under so many different banners (Ralph’s in California, Fred Meyer in the northwest, etc.) Removing their name neutralizes the products across their system.

What is breakthrough about the solution is that the owl character directly engages the shopper in the store. Additionally the brand communicates something positive about the shopper’s decision once at home versus being just a graphic announcement of low price. The packaging, by actually “speaking”, becomes a part of the store experience itself as shoppers scan the shelves. The owl and provocatively bouncy type interrupt with a proposition that is almost anti-brand. Once in the home pantry, it then reinforces that Mom is smart, not a mere penny-pincher.

Here the owl as a spoke-species is the wise purveyor of intelligent choices. In this economy of “good enough” he intervenes in the aisle and alerts shoppers with a direct message; “Psst, check this out…”

Private label merchandise is a powerful means for retailers to manage margin and retain customers with proprietary offerings. Here the new Kroger program creatively becomes part of the store experience itself. The hard part is the art of managing the SKU’s so that they do not trade down shoppers from their higher priced options, but entice them into categories they are buying at dollar stores or avoiding all together.

After a few hundred trips I may get tired of the owl or he may start to lose his interrupting power, but hey, he may start saying other creative and relevant things and become a valuable new brand asset. Knock knock. Who’s there? A great new approach to connecting private label with the store experience.

What Would You Pay to Shop at Your Favorite Store?

How much for your time?

How much for your time?

The thought of paying to shop is a ridiculous idea, but we all do it. We pay with our time not our cash. If we think about store experiences this way… as products people buy… it can change how we should innovate retail experiences.

The thought of paying for a retail experience came to me as an epiphany while I was on a panel discussion on ‘bricks and mortar retail in a digital world’ at the Consumer Electronics Show in Las Vegas last year. The question from the panel leader was about the challenges retailers face creating loyalty. My response was “I pay $79 a year to be loyal to Amazon”. It’s true. If I am willing to pay to be an Amazon Prime customer I am going to certainly look there first for the merchandise I want so I can benefit from my membership. The enticement to become a member was ‘free shipping’, and the math seemed fair, but now by brain dilutes the cost over the entire Amazon experience and I feel value beyond the shipping savings. I can’t imagine NOT being a Prime member.

This pay-to-shop model is not new. It has been around at least since the dawn of warehouse clubs. Costco, Sam’s, and BJ’s are all acutely aware that they have to provide member value, and filter their decisions based on this foundation. They know if their members are not perceiving an annual savings AND a great experience they will bail. The issue with the club operators is that the added value is not “environmental” in the form of store design, but believe me when I say they put an equal amount of energy into the design of their  store experience via curated assortments, adjacency and operations, the treasure-hunt atmosphere, and exciting seasonal merchandising.

Amazon Prime and Club stores are monetary costs, but when they choose a retailer shoppers are still weighing the cost of their decision, but with the currency of time.

I have a client friend who ran dealer development for a major equipment manufacturer who once said to me “When someone asks me what a tractor costs I tell them it costs what we sell it to the dealer for. What they pay is that plus the value the dealer adds in the sales and service experience.”  Forget the Prime and Club models and think in terms of how your store, your department experience, and your category solutions deliver an experience that is worth 10 or 30 minutes versus 10 or 30 dollars. This can be a transformational way of thinking about innovation in retail.

A time/value framework can be a simple one for approaching both how a store delivers today and how it could be delivering more tomorrow.  For known value items like detergent and milk the assumption is that price parity or better must rule. But for other wants and needs that are not price sensitive, and certainly part of a “reason to visit” a retailer, ask how the experience of shopping before, during, and after the trip can be worth more than the “stuff”. How can it make the shopper feel smarter, more attractive, more hip, more…something. The goal is to have an emotional end-benefit that is constantly and consistently delivered in the experience and reinforced through communications. The result is the shopper driving…or clicking past competitive retailers to get to their preferred store.

Today the seamless store experience and the digital experience are the “how”. These are the vehicles, but like driving a car they are made up of smaller experiences like acceleration, cornering, and braking (and cupholders, and a great stereo, and power seats) that make the experience a joy. Try thinking about the value you are getting for your time the next time you shop. We all do it subconsciously already, just become aware. It just might lead you to a new way to innovate.